Topic 11 · page 16 of 21
Activation energy by calculation
Subtract the Arrhenius equation at two temperatures and the constant A cancels. The result links two rate constants, two temperatures and the activation energy, and can be rearranged for any of them.
Read first: Activation energy from a graph
Using the equation directly 11.10
If you are given , A and T, you can calculate k from the Arrhenius equation. The units are the trap: must be in J mol⁻¹, so multiply kJ mol⁻¹ by 1000.
Worked exampleCalculating k
A reaction has = 52.0 kJ mol⁻¹ and A = 2.0 × 10⁸ s⁻¹. Calculate k at 298 K. (R = 8.31 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹)
- = 52.0 × 1000 = 52 000 J mol⁻¹
- exponent = ÷ RT = 52 000 ÷ (8.31 × 298) = 20.998
- = 7.59 × 10⁻¹⁰
- k = 2.0 × 10⁸ × 7.59 × 10⁻¹⁰ = 0.15 s⁻¹
The two-temperature equation 11.10
You often have k at two temperatures and no value of A. Write the Arrhenius equation in log form at each temperature and subtract. The ln A terms cancel:
The second form is the easiest to use: the bracket is positive when is the higher temperature, and so is the left side when k rises.
MethodTwo-temperature calculations
- Convert temperatures to kelvin and label them , with , .
- Work out ln( ÷ ) and (1/ − 1/). Keep extra figures, because the bracket is a small difference between two large numbers.
- Rearrange for the unknown and substitute.
- Give in J mol⁻¹ and convert to kJ mol⁻¹ at the end.
Worked exampleThe rate constant doubles for a 10 K rise
The rate constant of a reaction doubles when the temperature rises from 298 K to 308 K. Calculate .
- ln 2 = 0.6931
- 1/298 − 1/308 = 3.3557 × 10⁻³ − 3.2468 × 10⁻³ = 1.0895 × 10⁻⁴ K⁻¹
- = R × ln 2 ÷ 1.0895 × 10⁻⁴ = 8.31 × 0.6931 ÷ 1.0895 × 10⁻⁴ = 5.29 × 10⁴ J mol⁻¹
- = 52.9 kJ mol⁻¹
This shows where the rule of thumb "the rate roughly doubles for every 10 K rise" comes from. It is true for of about 50 kJ mol⁻¹ near room temperature.
Worked exampleTwo measured rate constants, in °C
A reaction has k = 3.20 × 10⁻⁴ s⁻¹ at 25 °C and 1.90 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ at 45 °C. Calculate .
- = 25 + 273 = 298 K and = 45 + 273 = 318 K
- ln( ÷ ) = ln(1.90 × 10⁻³ ÷ 3.20 × 10⁻⁴) = ln 5.9375 = 1.7813
- 1/298 − 1/318 = 2.1105 × 10⁻⁴ K⁻¹
- = 8.31 × 1.7813 ÷ 2.1105 × 10⁻⁴ = 7.01 × 10⁴ J mol⁻¹
- = 70.1 kJ mol⁻¹
Worked exampleFinding k at a new temperature
A reaction has = 60.0 kJ mol⁻¹ and k = 0.0200 s⁻¹ at 298 K. Calculate k at 318 K.
- ln( ÷ ) = (60 000 ÷ 8.31) × (1/298 − 1/318) = 7220.2 × 2.1105 × 10⁻⁴ = 1.5238
- ÷ = = 4.590
- = 0.0200 × 4.590 = 0.0918 s⁻¹
Check yourself
- Write the equation that links two rate constants, the two temperatures and .
- The rate constant triples when the temperature rises from 300 K to 310 K. Calculate in kJ mol⁻¹.
- k is 2.5 × 10⁻⁴ s⁻¹ at 25 °C and 3.0 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ at 55 °C. Calculate in kJ mol⁻¹.
- A reaction has = 45.0 kJ mol⁻¹ and k = 1.20 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ at 300 K. Calculate k at 320 K.
- A catalyst lowers from 80.0 to 50.0 kJ mol⁻¹. Assuming A is unchanged, calculate by what factor k increases at 298 K.
- A student uses 25 and 35 in place of the temperatures in kelvin and gets a different answer from the correct one. Explain why this is wrong, and say whether the result would be too large or too small.
Answers cover these until you have tried the questions
- , with T in kelvin and in J mol⁻¹.
- ln 3 = 1.0986. 1/300 − 1/310 = 1.0753 × 10⁻⁴ K⁻¹. = 8.31 × 1.0986 ÷ 1.0753 × 10⁻⁴ = 8.49 × 10⁴ J mol⁻¹ = 84.9 kJ mol⁻¹.
- = 298 K, = 328 K. ÷ = 3.0 × 10⁻³ ÷ 2.5 × 10⁻⁴ = 12, ln 12 = 2.4849. 1/298 − 1/328 = 3.0692 × 10⁻⁴. = 8.31 × 2.4849 ÷ 3.0692 × 10⁻⁴ = 6.73 × 10⁴ J mol⁻¹ = 67.3 kJ mol⁻¹.
- ln( ÷ ) = (45 000 ÷ 8.31) × (1/300 − 1/320) = 5415.2 × 2.0833 × 10⁻⁴ = 1.1282. ÷ = = 3.090. = 1.20 × 10⁻³ × 3.090 = 3.7 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹.
- The ratio of rate constants = . 30 000 ÷ (8.31 × 298) = 12.11, and = 1.8 × 10⁵. k increases by a factor of about 1.8 × 10⁵.
- Kelvin is needed because the equation uses the absolute temperature, and 1/T with T = 25 or 35 is a very different number from 1/298 or 1/308. The bracket (1/25 − 1/35 = 0.0114) is about 100 times larger than the real bracket (1/298 − 1/308 = 1.09 × 10⁻⁴), so the calculated would be far too small.